In this article, I will try to explain the basic planning principles for 5G in comparison to its predecessor (LTE). I remember that during the introduction of LTE, it took quite some time for everyone to understand its planning and design procedures so I will try to explain the fundamental steps required to plan a 5G network enabling everyone to develop an understanding of the 5G network design.
Like LTE, the 5G network requires a PCI, RACH and TAC plan. The process differs slightly due to the changes in the RF structure. There is an additional dimension in 5G which is related to massive MIMO or beam-forming. There might be scenarios where the beam-forming configuration will be designed as well but we will discuss that later.
As we are all aware, there are 504 PCIs in LTE that are used to plan the 4G network that I explained in my previous article, PCI Planning: Facts & Myths. The PCI itself is made up of PSS and SSS, where PSS has three values (0 to 3) while the SSS has 168 values (0 to 167). The structure of the 4G PCI is based on the following equation.
PCI = (3 x SSS) + PSS
This means that if the PCI value is 10, then the SSS is 3 and PSS is 1 (3 x 3 + 1 = 10). In 5G, the basic structure of the PSS is same as LTE but the number of SSS has increased. The total number of SSS in 5G is 336 (0 to 335) while the PSS count is still 3 (0 to 2). This means that the maximum PCI count for 5G would be 1008 (0 to 1007)
Total 5G PCI Count = (3 x 335) + 2 = 1007
Ofcourse, the first rule is similar to 4G which is to ensure that the same PCI is not re-used within close proximity. This is required to avoid PCI conflicts and confusions. However, the second rule differs slightly then the one in 4G.
PCI-mod-3 & PCI-mod-4: As explained in my previous article on PCI Planning in 4G, every third PCI has the same Reference Signal position in frequency domain and causes interference between them. So, PCI mod-3 should not be used in overlapping cells. However, in case of 5G, there are some differences. Firstly, 5G does not have CRS which means that it does not send Reference Signals all across the bandwidth like 4G so that removes the chances of interference between reference signals and it also removes the high constant noise created by reference signals. Secondly, 5G only uses DMRS in PBCH and these follow PCI mod-4 rule which means that every 4th PCI has the same location for PBCH DMRS in the frequency domain. Thus, the rule for 5G changes to PCI mod-4.
However, since 5G only has 3 PSS like LTE, so every third PCI will have the same PSS value. This can cause interference on the PSS so PCI mod-3 cannot be totally ignored. Having said that, the same PSS will not cause a KPI impact but might delay the synchronization. I believe that this issue would be suppressed if the beam-forming is used for the SSB which should be the case in most of the initial 5G trials.
The figure above shows the relation between PCI and PBCH DMRS. There is another difference in the concept of LTE’s PCI mod-3 and 5G’s PCI mod-4. In LTE, the CRS are all over the bandwidth and they follow the PCI mod-3 rule but in case of 5G, the DMRS are only inside the PBCH. This means that even if the two neighboring cells follow PCI mod-4 rule, the DMRS of one cell will still be overlapped with the PBCH data of the second cell as the PBCH will always be present. So, the gain of following the PCI mod-4 rule might not be that much although it will have some gain considering that the structure of DMRS and PBCH is different.
In short, the PCI mod-3 and PCI mod-4 should be followed for initial planning of the network.
The RACH planning concept is pretty much similar for both 4G and 5G but the Ncs tables have changed and some new preamble formats have been introduced. In 5G, there are two groups of preambles
- Long Preamble Formats : These are format 0, 1, 2 and 3 with length of 839
- Short Preamble Formats : These are formats A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, B3, B4, C0, C2 with length of 139
Long preamble formats will have more overhead but it will have a bigger cell radius while the short formats will have a lower overhead but also a smaller cell radius. The Ncs values can be seen in 3GPP-38.211 under 6.3.3 which describes the PRACH. As an example, lets take a short preamble so this will take us to the Ncs table 184.108.40.206-7
So, now if I choose a cell radius of 3 km for the cell, then using multipath delay spread of 2 microseconds, the corresponding Ncs value 2 will be around 45. This will map to the next Ncs value of 46 in the table which means that root sequence will have a cyclic shift of 46 to generate next preamble. The length of the short preamble is 139 so the number of preambles that can be generated by each root sequence will be
Number of Preambles Per Root Sequence = Floor(139/46) = 3
As we need 64 preambles per cell so the number of root sequences required to generate 64 preambles will be
Number of Root Sequences Required For 64 Preambles = Ceil(64/3) = 22
This means that the RACH plan will be made such that the first cell uses root sequences from 0 to 21 while the second cell will use 22 to 43 and so on. These are the basics for the RACH design and we can use the above method to generate RACH plans for different scenarios.
The TAC or TAL planning for 5G is similar to 4G. Infact, as the current 5G NR will be using the NSA mode, so initially it should be using the same TAC or TAL as the 4G network. However, the principles for TAC planning are same as given below
- The paging load should be calculated to ensure that the TAC is not so big that the paging overhead gets too high. This issue is usually mitigated with the intelligent/dynamic/precise paging features
- If the TAC is too small, this will result in a lot of TAUs that can generate signaling overheads. This can be handled by intelligent TAL planning or even user specific dynamic TAL assignments.
I hope this article helps in understanding the 5G NR planning and design fundamentals. Let me know if you have any questions.
Latest posts by Ali Khalid (see all)
- VoLTE Basics: Planning & Dimensioning - March 14, 2019
- 5G RF Design & Planning Fundamentals - September 11, 2018
- CSFB (Circuit Switch Fall Back) Explanation & Optimization - August 4, 2018